STUDENTS

 

Specific information of the EIF: regulations, offer of TFGs...

Remember to also consult the "Board" tab on this website and the news that we upload to the EIF Forum in the Virtual Classroom.

Do you need help solving a problem or have a complaint?

 

Delegates and Mentors

Associations

General information about the URJC: regulations, procedures, schedules, technology and computing...

You can access all the URJC regulations in this website. Among this documentation we highlight:

In addition, other websites may also be of interest to you, such as:

Services offered by the URJC

Courses 0 of Physics and Mathematics

The Zero Online Courses aim to help students better cope with the study of various basic training subjects in which prior knowledge is required. We currently have two zero courses: Mathematics and Physics.

If you are a new student and in your degree you have subjects related to these subjects, they are already available in your Virtual Classroom.

If you are not a new student or you do not have subjects related to these subjects in your degree, but you are interested in taking them, you can self-enroll in the course you want from the following links:

Mobility, Erasmus, Munde, Stays

 

RAC credit application procedure (For teachers)

All requests must be made directly to this URL: https://gestion2.urjc.es/rac/

Once the request is registered, it will be approved by the center.

There is a manual that explains the procedure for requesting RAC:

Once the activity is completed:

  • Send an email to with an attachment that is an Excel spreadsheet with the extension (.xls)
  • If all students have the same number of recognized credits, within the Excel file there should only be one column with the student's login without @alumnos.urjc.es (Example: c.garcial).  
  • In the email, clearly indicate: name of the activity, dates of completion and credits that were approved for the activity.
  • If each student has a different number of credits, there should be two columns in the spreadsheet. One with the student's login (without @alumnos.urjc.es) and the other with the number of credits. (Example: c.garcial 0,5)

For any questions, consult by email at

Transition plan to the new EIF curricula

  • New curriculum for the Aerospace Engineering degree (version 0.2) (PDF)
    • Table of recognitions from (GIAA, GIATA, GIAVA) to the new GIA (version 0.3) (PDF)
  • New curriculum for the degree in Telecommunication Technology Engineering (version 0.2) (PDF)
    • Table of acknowledgements from (GIT, GIST, GITT) to the new GITT (version 0.4) (PDF)
    • GISAM recognition table for the new GITT (version 0.2) (PDF)
  • New degree curricula in Fundamentals of Architecture (GFA), Landscape Architecture (GP) and Biomedical Engineering (GIB) (version 0.3) (PDF)
    • GFA Recognition Table (version 0.2) (PDF)
    • GP Recognition Table (version 0.2) (PDF)
    • GIB Recognition Table (version 0.2) (PDF)

 

 

Information for prospective students

 

Important information from the meeting with the University Ombudsman, Deputy Ombudsman, and President of the Coexistence Commission

A meeting for EIF delegates was organized on November 20, 2025 from 14:30 p.m. to 15:30 p.m.

Before the summer, we at EIF requested the University Ombudsman's collaboration in carrying out a series of activities to disseminate information among students and faculty regarding university life. This meeting on November 20th was for students. There will be another one for faculty in 2026.

We invited the University Ombudsman, Alberto Sánchez Campos, the Deputy University Ombudsman María Mar Moreno Rebato, and the President of the Coexistence Commission Javier de Prado Escudero to this meeting.

The aim of this first meeting was for the students of the School of Engineering (EIF), represented by their delegates, to learn firsthand about the state law on coexistence, its implementation at the Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC) through the coexistence regulations, and some important aspects of the evaluation regulations that frequently lead to conflicts that are ultimately resolved by the University Ombudsman or the Coexistence Committee. We at the Sub-Directorate of Student Affairs hope that this information will facilitate the work of the delegates and sub-delegates and contribute to improving coexistence within the School of Engineering.

The meeting was also attended by the deputy director of OA, Rebeca Goya, along with about 30 delegates from the EIF. Approximately half the hour was dedicated to presentations by the guests, and the other half hour to answering questions from the delegates. 

The Deputy to the University Ombudsman, María Mar Moreno Rebato, began by commenting on the legal framework: there is a Regulation for the Evaluation of Learning Outcomes, a Statute of the University Student, and a Regulation of University Coexistence that develops the Law of University Coexistence, in which, among others, the disciplinary regime that affects the student body is included, while the disciplinary regime of employees, teaching and research staff or technical and service staff is included in the Basic Statute of the Public Employee and in other regulations that were not the subject of this session.

The University Ombudsman, Alberto Sánchez Campos, then explained several important aspects of the Regulations for the Evaluation of Learning Outcomes. 

  • He commented that the right to evaluation arises from enrollment, and gives the right to be evaluated in two calls, ordinary and extraordinary (Article 15). 
  • He clarified that the URJC's evaluation model is that of continuous evaluation, which implies, among other things, that there is a limit to the maximum percentage that an evaluation test can contribute to the final grade, which is 60%. 
  • He commented that all evaluation activities are subject to principles of personal merit and authority (Art. 6), and that non-compliance with the rule implies that the student may be subject to the disciplinary regulations of the Code of Conduct in case of copying or plagiarism, with up to 3 years of expulsion from the URJC.
  • He indicated that students have the right to have exactly the same evaluation method used for all students in the same subject, even if the subject is taught on different campuses or in different groups. 
  • As for students with academic dispensation, these students must be evaluated exactly the same as everyone else.
  • Non-re-evaluable activities are only permitted in extremely exceptional cases where there is a physical impossibility of repeating the evaluation activity, and coordinators must be strict in eliminating virtually all non-re-evaluable activities from the teaching guides.
  • If the minimum grade established for a re-evaluable activity is exceeded, it cannot be re-evaluated, unless the subject is not passed, in which case some of them can be re-evaluated in order to be able to pass in the second call.
  • Regarding the date, time, and location set for assessment tests, students may request changes due to hospitalization, illness, etc. (Art. 23). Furthermore, students have the right to arrive up to 20 minutes late to an assessment test, during which time no student should leave the testing area. If the professor is late, they may be late for up to 30 minutes. After those 30 minutes, if the professor has not arrived, students may leave, and the assessment test must be rescheduled.  
  • Attendance at the review is mandatory if you wish to subsequently request a Complaints Committee hearing from the center. Failure to attend the review must be justified in the same way as failure to attend the assessment test. 
  • The student's grade cannot be lowered during the review process. 
  • In cases of copying or plagiarism, the professor may suspend the student, but cannot impose any other type of sanction, such as barring them from taking the second exam. The professor may, if deemed appropriate, initiate proceedings before the Student Conduct Committee, which will then issue any applicable sanctions.
  • En services.urjc.es/help There is an infographic in a link that appears at the top with information on the procedures available to students.

Finally, the President of the Coexistence Commission briefly explained its purpose and operation.